Maternity Acupressure header
 

Previous: Elective Labor Induction

Problems and Hazards of
Induction of Labor



REFERENCES

 

1. Alexander JM, McIntire DD, and Leveno KJ. Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:291-4.

2. Brisson-Carroll G et al. The effect of routine early amniotomy on spontaneous labor: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87(5 Pt 2):891-6.

3. Cammu H et al. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(2):240-4.

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of perinatal Group B streptococcal disease. MMWR 2002;51(No. RR-11).

5. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP. Listening to Mothers: Report of the First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association, Oct 2002.

6. FDA. Cytotec (misoprostol). Access at: http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/SAFETY/2002/safety02.htm#cytote,2002.

7. Fullerton JT and Severino R. In-hospital care for low-risk childbirth: comparison with results from the National Birth Center Study. J Nurse Midwifery 1992;37(5):331-340.

8. Garite TJ et al. The influence of elective amniotomy on fetal heart rate patterns and the course of labor in term patients: a randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(6 Pt 1):1827-1832.

9. Goer H. Elective induction of labor. http://www.hencigoer.com/downloads/elective_induction.rtf

10. Goer H. The Thinking Woman’s Guide to a Better Birth. New York: Perigee Books, 1999, p 228-9.

11. Goffinet F et al. Early amniotomy increases the frequency of fetal heart rate abnormalities. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1997;104(5):548-53.

12. Gonen O et al. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol1997;89(6):913-7.

13. Goodman D. Forced labor. Mother Jones Jan/Feb 2001:17-19.

14. Hannah ME et al. Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and prelabor rupture of membranes at term:the role of induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(4):780-5.

15. Herbst A, Wolner-Hanssen P, and Ingemarsson I. Risk factors for acidemia at birth. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90(1):125-30.

16. Hofmeyr GJ and Gulmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2000.Oxford: Update Software.

17. Kaufman KE, Bailit JL, and Grobman W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(4):858-63.

18. Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term(Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2002.Oxford: Update Software.

19. Levy H et al. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64(4):499-502.

20. Lydon-Rochelle M et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl JMed 2001;345(1): 3-8.

21. MacDorman M et al. Trends and characteristics of induced labour in the United States, 1989-98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:263-73.

22. Martin JA et al. Births: final data for 2001. Nat Vital Stat Rep 2002;51(2).

23. Menticoglou SM and Hall PF. Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus. BJOG 2002;109:485-91.

24. Mittendorf R et al. The length of uncomplicated human gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75(6):929-32.

25. Mosby. Oxytocin. Mosby’s GenRx Access at: http://www.orgyn.com/resources/genrx/d001945.asp

26. Peck P. Preinduction cervical ripening significantly increases risk of cesarean. Medscape Medical News, 2003. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/453298

27. Searle. letter to health care providers. Aug 23, 200028. Stein L. Un-informed consent. Metroactive http://www.metroactive.com/metro/cover/cytotec1-0212.html, 2002.

29. Tey A, Eriksen NL, and Blanco JD. A prospective randomized trial of induction versus expectant management innondiabetic pregnancies with fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(1 Pt 2):293.

30. Wing DA and Paul RH. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175(1):158-64.

31. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2(8452):436-437.

 

 

© 2003 by The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services (CIMS).

Permission granted to reproduce with complete attribution.
www.motherfriendly.org

Please contact us for a complementary copy of this fact sheet,
or other Coalition for Improving Maternity Services publications.

P.O. Box 2346Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32004
info@motherfriendly.org
Phone toll-free: 888-282-CIMS (2467)
Fax: 904-285-2120

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  FAQ  |  Term of Service   |  Privacy statement

 


© 2006 Golden Publishing House. All rights reserved.
27 Jalan Sempadan #03-11, Singapore


DISCLAIMER
The material provided in this site is provided for personal, non-commercial, educational and informational purposes only and in no way should be considered as an offering of medical advice. You should regularly consult a licensed health care professional in matters relating to your pregnancy, labor and health in general and particularly in respect to any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical attention.